ABSTRACT
Crown discoloration can be induced by root canal sealer remnants following root canal treatment. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate chromatic alterations in human tooth crowns induced by a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-based sealer (MTA Fillapex®) and a commonly used ZnOE-based sealer (Roth-811). The tested null hypothesis was that the application of the materials did not induce clinically perceptible crown discoloration (Ho: CIE color difference ΔE<3.7). Material and Methods: Forty five fully developed, intact, mandibular third molars were sectioned 1 mm below the cemento-enamel junction. The pulp chambers were chemomechanically debrided via the cervical access. The specimens were randomly assigned into three groups Group 1: MTA Fillapex, Group 2: Roth 811, Group 3: Negative control (unfilled) and immersed in individually marked vials containing distilled water up to the cervix (37±1°C). The spectral reflectance lines were recorded by utilizing a UV-VIS spectrophotometer equipped with integration sphere in the visual spectrum at baseline, 1 week, 1 and 3 months after material placement. Data were transformed into values of the CIE L*a*b* color system and the corresponding ΔE values were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way mixed ANOVA models, at p=0.05 level of significance. Results: A statistically significant increase in a* and b* chromatic parameters of the MTA Fillapex Group was measured. However, ΔE values did not exceed the human eye perceptibility threshold (set at ΔE<3.7) during the experimental period (ΔEt3=2.88). In Roth-811 Group, a statistically significant decrease in L* and a statistically significant increase in a* and b* chromatic parameters was measured, during all observation periods. Resultant ΔE values exceeded the human eye perceptibility threshold after 1 week (ΔEt1=5.65). Conclusions: Application of MTA Fillapex in tooth crowns resulted in minimal color alterations, while Roth 811 induced severe discoloration, in vitro. It could be suggested that, in terms of aesthetics, the use of MTA Fillapex appears to be favorable.
Subject(s)
Humans , Aluminum Compounds/chemistry , Calcium Compounds/chemistry , Oxides/chemistry , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Silicates/chemistry , Tooth Crown/drug effects , Tooth Discoloration/chemically induced , Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Aluminum Compounds/adverse effects , Color , Calcium Compounds/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Materials Testing , Oxides/adverse effects , Reference Values , Root Canal Filling Materials/adverse effects , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet , Silicates/adverse effects , Time Factors , Tooth Crown/chemistry , Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Resilon is a new material that is a candidate to replace gutta-percha as a root filling material. This study evaluated the antiproliferative effect of Resilon and two commercially available gutta-percha points (Roeko, Dentsply). Two established cell lines (L929 and RPC-C2A) were used for the experiment. Cell survival fraction was estimated by the sulforhodamine-B assay, in reference to controls after 48-h exposure. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons) were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the results (α=0.05). Cytotoxicity in a descending order was: Resilon > Roeko gutta-percha > Dentsply gutta-percha. At 24-h exposure, no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were observed between tested materials in both cell lines. At 48-h exposure, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between Resilon and the other materials in the L929 cell line. In the RPC-C2A cell line Resilon was significantly more cytotoxic than Dentsply gutta-percha (p<0.05), but no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found between Resilon and Roeko gutta-percha. The cytotoxicity of Resilon increased significantly from 24 h to 48 h in both cell lines. Resilon points were more cytotoxic than gutta-percha points. The cytotoxicity was time dependent and increased after 48 h.
Resilon é um material novo com potencial para substituir a guta-percha como material obturador radicular. Este estudo avaliou o efeito anti-proliferativo do Resilon e de duas marcas comerciais de pontas de guta-percha (Roeko e Dentsply). Para os fins deste estudo foram utilizadas duas linhagens celulares conhecidas (L929 e RPC-C2A). A fração de sobrevivência celular foi estimada pelo método colorimétrico de sulforodamina B comparado aos controles após exposição por 48 h. A significância estatística dos resultados (α=0,05) foi avaliada pelos testes não-paramétricos de Kruskal-Wallis e Dunn para comparações múltiplas. A citotoxicidade dos materiais em ordem decrescente foi: Resilon > guta-percha Roeko > guta-percha Dentsply. Após 24 h de exposição, não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p>0,05) entre os materiais testados em ambas as linhagens celulares. Após 48 h, o Resilon apresentou um efeito citotóxico significantemente maior (p<0,05) em comparação aos outros dois materiais na linhagem celular L929. Na linhagem RPC-C2A, a citotoxicidade do Resilon foi significantemente maior (p<0,05) que a da guta-percha Dentsply, mas não houve diferenças significantes (p<0,05) entre Resilon e guta-percha Roeko. A citotoxicidade do Resilon aumentou significativamente de 24 para 48 h para ambas as linhagens celulares. As pontas de Resilon foram mais citotóxicas do que as pontas de guta-percha. A citotoxicidade foi tempo-dependente e aumentou após 48 h de exposição.